4 Things About Interest Rates

Although it may not seem like it at first, interest rates really are interesting. High rates are great news for savers but bad news for borrowers and vice versa. Regardless of whether you’re a saver or a borrower, it’s important to understand 4 key points about interest rates.

For savers interest rates are in a race against inflation

Life is often a balancing act between conflicting goals and possibilities. In financial terms, this generally boils down to risk versus reward and/or cost versus benefit. Higher-risk investments can offer the possibility of great returns but, pretty much by definition, there is also the possibility of losing your initial investment. Cash savings can be viewed as safe in the sense that there is a relatively low risk of the saver losing their deposit, but if inflation (the cost of living) outpaces interest rates (the return on investment), savers can find their nest egg losing its value in real terms. This can be particularly challenging for older people on fixed incomes (pensioners) who do not necessarily have the long-term investment horizon of the younger generation but who do have a need for a reliable source of income to maintain themselves.

The interest rates available to consumers may be completely different to central-bank rates

About once a month, the press reports on the activities of the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England, which sets the Bank of England’s interest rates. These are the rates charged (or paid) to banks which borrow from or deposit with the Bank of England. These rates may then feed through into consumer products such as savings accounts, mortgages and credit cards, some of which track this base rate. Some products, however, are fixed-rate and hence are unaffected any changes to the interest rates set by the Bank of England for the life of the fixed-rate deal. The key point to understand is that the interest rates offered to consumers are influenced by a number of factors as well as the base rate. Some of these are generic, such as what the banks think of the economy in general. Some, however, are specific to each individual, such as their credit history. Then, of course, there is the simple fact that banks need to pay their own bills and make a profit for their shareholders.

How do interest rates affect the market?

It’s usually considered that rising interest rates are bad news for stock markets. Reduced spending on goods as businesses and consumers borrow can cause stocks to drop. This is only a part of it though as different types of investments see rate rises differently. For instance gold may appears less shiny when interest rates are high as it doesn’t pay interest and can be less attractive to store.

The impact on property investment is found when combined with mortgages and higher interest rates. Mortgages become more expensive making buy to let less profitable. Savvy developers however will watch the economy and know when to hold back on new build. This can then increase a demand for property in that area meaning that the returns in development can still be high.

As with all investments, there is no hard and fast rule and you can lose as well as win.

Interest can be simple or compound

With simple interest, the interest payments are calculated purely on the basis of the initial sum deposited or lent. So, for example, if you deposit £100 then the interest you receive will always be based on that initial £100. With compound interest, however, interest is calculated on a rolling basis. Hence for example, if, after the first year you had received a total of £10 in interest payments, your next year’s interest payment would be calculated on the whole £110 rather than just the £100 you initially deposited. This is great news for savers but, of course, terrible news for borrowers and is part of the reason why those who take out high-interest credit can wind up paying more in interest than they borrowed to begin with.

Continue reading

Landlords Vs Limited Companies

Napoleon is said to have described the English as a nation of shopkeepers. If he were around today, he might describe it as a nation of small-scale landlords. In the near future, however, people might refer to the UK as a nation of corporate landlords as changes to the financial and legal landscape impact both the cost-effectiveness of being a private landlord and the level of personal risk involved.

Investment is about numbers

You buy a home to live in, but you buy an investment property to make you an income. In the most basic of terms, you work out the gross income you can generate from your property, you estimate your expenses, and you decide if the difference between these two figures leaves you with enough profit to be worth the effort involved. If circumstances change, you do your sums again and decide whether or not your investment is still worthwhile. Recent, well-publicised, changes to the tax system have the potential to be seriously detrimental to the net income generated by investment properties held by private landlords, i.e. landlords letting out property outside the framework of a limited company. The announcement of these changes led to a slew of articles both online and in mainstream publications, discussing the possible use of the so-called “landlord loophole”, i.e. the possibility of converting a property portfolio from a private holding to an asset belonging to a limited company. While this might be a good idea in theory, in reality, setting up a limited company can be an expensive and complex undertaking, so much so that small-scale landlords may find it more appropriate simply to sell up and find another investment vehicle.

Risk is also a factor

All landlords have to deal with three main forms of risk:

  • the risk of property being damaged
  • the risk of being sued for compensation for negligence
  • the risk of letting a property to a tenant without the “right to rent”

Even though the risks may be the same, how they affect landlords can be very different. While dealing with a damaged property may be the most obvious risk of being a landlord, it’s arguably the one which should cause the least degree of concern since it can usually be mitigated through a combination of tenant selection, deposits and insurance. The risk of being sued for compensation for negligence may be much smaller and again there are steps landlords can take to mitigate it (the obvious example of this being to take good care of their property), but in a world of “no win no fee” lawyers and adverts making people aware of the possibility of them claiming compensation for an accident which wasn’t their fault, the reality is that even the best landlords can find themselves on the receiving end of a claim from a tenant who has nothing to lose. If a private landlord is found negligent, they are personally liable for the damages, whereas a limited companies can only be sued to the extent of their assets. Likewise, while the “right to rent” scheme applies equally to both private and corporate landlords, the former may find it much harder to navigate the complexities of the scheme in a non-discriminatory manner.

The end for private landlords?

While it’s still relatively early days and the attraction of owning property in the UK should never be underestimated, it is fair to say that the government’s actions have the potential to push private landlords out of the market. Smaller private landlords may well just liquidate their portfolio and move on, while larger ones may become limited companies. What’s more, the government has committed to abolishing letting agent fees for tenants, which presumably means that letting agents will charge landlords instead. While, in theory, this should be a situation which is six to one and half a dozen of the other, private landlords who are already seeing their returns dwindle and their risks increase (due to the right to rent scheme) may decide that enough is enough.

Continue reading

Housing Needs For The Forthcoming Year

The snap election seems to have taken many people by surprise, including, it would appear, the Prime Minister who called it. Having been deprived of her last minister for housing, Gavin Barwell, who lost his seat, she has recently appointed a replacement in the form of Alok Sharma. Given that he is the 6th housing minister to be appointed in roughly as many years (since 2010), it is an open question as to how long he will stay in post, but assuming he makes it to this time next year, what are his priorities likely to be?

Housing refurbishment

While many newspaper headlines have been devoted to the overall shortage of housing and the corresponding difficulty of “getting on the housing ladder”, the tragic events at Grenfell Tower have brutally highlighted the fact that some of the UK’s existing housing stock is in drastic need of refurbishment. What form this will take will depend on just how bad its condition is. In some cases, it may be possible simply to update and upgrade existing buildings. In other cases, the only realistic option may be to demolish the existing structure and start again.   In either case, it is very possible that the high-profile nature of the Grenfell Tower fire will mean that the refurbishment of existing properties goes to the top of the political agenda.

Home-building

The Conservative manifesto promise was to build a total of 1.5 million new homes by 2022, of which 1 million were to be delivered by 2020 (this total including houses built as a result of actions taken by the last parliament). It will be interesting to see whether or not the Conservatives will be able to make good on this pledge. The simple fact of the matter is that government support for home building is dependant upon tax revenues and the uncertainty around Brexit may make it rather difficult to forecast how many people are going to be in the UK to pay taxes, let alone how many of them will be in work and what level of tax they will pay. Added to this, there is a large question mark hanging over the availability of labour for the construction industry, which has long relied on trades people from eastern Europe, which makes it difficult to predict the cost and schedule of housing projects and that is without taking into account the fact that the weakness of Sterling may well continue for the foreseeable future and while this is good news for exporters (and inbound tourism), it is bad news for anyone who needs to import either materials or labour (or encourage labourers already in the country to stay here instead of taking their skills elsewhere). Notwithstanding all this, it is to be hoped that the government will do all it can to support home building as the UK has long suffered from a shortage of housing stock.

Improving the situation for renters

Previous housing minister Gavin Barwell pledged to ban lettings agencies charging fees to tenants. This change has yet to be implemented, although given the amount of press coverage it received, it would probably be politically-challenging for the Conservatives to reverse the decision. While this pledge was welcomed by tenants, landlords and lettings agencies commented that any fees charged to landlords would have to be passed on to tenants. Those in favour of the change, countered that this does not appear to have been the case in Scotland. This, however, is a bit of an open question. Rents have risen in Scotland since the ban on letting agent fees (to tenants) was introduced in 2012 and although a 2013 study found that only 2% of landlords raised rents specifically because of this, it is still entirely possible that the change factored into the calculations of the other 98%. Ultimately the issues in the rental market reflect overall lack of supply and the only meaningful way to address this is to improve the supply, for example by encouraging build-to-rent schemes.

Continue reading

It’s Not Grim Up North

Data from peer-to-peer lender Kuflink shows that rental yields in the North of England and Scotland have been comfortably beating rental yields in London at 4.3% and 3.2% respectively. While this is, of course, interesting news for (potential) buy-to-let investors, it’s still useful market intelligence for those who prefer to avoid the politics of buy-to-let and invest in the property market through other channels, for example property development.

Takeaway point 1 – There’s a difference between price and value

London and the South East is an expensive place and hence landlords are likely to be able to charge higher rents than they would for equivalent properties in other parts of the country. The flip side of this, however, is that buying the rental property is likely to have cost them more than an equivalent property in another part of the country. There are still plenty of reasons why the Thames Valley area could be a good place to invest in property in some way, but it’s worth remembering that there is strong demand for property in other parts of the UK as well and hence opportunities for investors.

Takeaway point 2 – It’s always worth looking out for up-and-coming areas

According to Kuflink, Manchester and Salford provided rental yields of 6.7% and 6.6% respectively whereas Cambridge was a mere 2.7%. The data did not analyse why this was so, but one very feasible explanation is that Manchester and its neighbour Salford have both been in a process of regeneration over recent years, with the BBC making news itself by moving some of its production to Salford back in 2012. The availability of work attracts people to an area, particularly young adults, for whom renting is likely to be the most appropriate option, even if they have the funds to buy. The combination of relatively low house prices (compared to London) and increased demand for rental properties makes for good rental yield. It also offers good opportunities for other forms of property investment since many of the people who arrive as renters will ultimately settle down and buy property in the area. Cambridge, by contrast, is a mature market. As a University town, it has a pretty much guaranteed market for rental properties and as a research centre it also has a demand for property to buy, but there is nothing new about any of this and so the opportunity to invest at the start of an upward trend is really long gone. The North of England and Scotland have both been benefitting from improved infrastructure (particularly transport links and broadband internet) and as they are outside the “city” zone, they have less reason to be concerned about the prospect of some financial service roles being moved out of the UK due to Brexit.

Takeaway point 3 – Quality matters

The fact that in the UK there is always a strong demand for housing is hardly a secret and a quick scan of a newspaper website will probably reveal plenty of articles about landlords and home builders taking advantage of desperate renters or buyers. While there is certainly an element of truth in this, the simple fact is that the fundamentals of business also apply to the property market, even though it generally moves at a slower pace. Companies (or individuals) who supply shoddy goods and/or poor customer service may make a quick short-term profit, but over the long term they tend to get found out and weeded out. Because of this, anyone looking to make meaningful, long-term returns from property, whether that’s as a landlord or as an investor in property development, is well advised to be very selective about their purchases and only put money into high-quality builds.

Continue reading

How Will Stamp Duty Affect Buy To Let?

April 2016 saw the introduction of a 3% stamp duty levy charged on purchases where the purchaser already owned a property. There were a few exceptions to this and certain circumstances in which the levy could be refunded (e.g. if people were moving from one property to another and only had two properties temporarily). Buy-to-let landlords, however, essentially pay 3% more for a property than a first-time buyer would.

The Theory

Home buyers and buy-to-let landlords are in direct competition for properties. Competition increases prices and higher-priced houses require larger mortgages and hence higher incomes and bigger deposits. If higher house prices mean that people are unable to afford to buy, then these people are, effectively, forced to rent and as renters they have to pay their landlord while saving for a deposit. This puts them at a disadvantage in the property market. The 3% surcharge is, therefore, intended to level the playing field.

The Reality

Given that the 3% surcharge was introduced just a few months before the Brexit vote, with all the turbulence that has caused, it is difficult to impossible to determine what specific impact the surcharge has had by itself. What is, however, possible, is to look at recent history and see what indicators it may give for the future. Home ownership has long been a central plank of government strategy (at least since the days of Margaret Thatcher). Over recent years, various governments have introduced a range of schemes to make it easier for first-time buyers to get on the housing ladder. These have included: shared ownership, equity loan, mortgage guarantee and the help-to-buy ISA. For want of a better term, these schemes can be seen as carrots to help home buyers. The government’s new stamp duty surcharge, therefore, can be seen as a stick with which to beat BTL landlords. The fact that the government is now using sticks as well as carrots raises the question of what other action might be taken to make life more difficult for BTL investors if the current measures fail to have the desired effect.

Moving Forward

The BTL market, for the moment, still seems very much alive and well and there has already been extensive discussion about the action(s) landlords could take to minimise (or eliminate) the effect of these charges. Suggestions have varied from passing the costs on to tenants to moving properties into a limited company, whereupon different tax rules apply. The challenge facing BTL investors is that if they find themselves locked into a battle with government policy any move they make, even if it is legal at the time, can be rendered ineffective at a later point through a change in the law or the tax system. On the one hand, there are many reasons why the BTL market could and should offer attractive returns in a country like the UK, on the other hand some investors may be feeling uncomfortable about the prospect of being in the government spotlight and may be looking for alternative ways to profit from the UK’s thriving property market.

Is property development the new BTL?

One point on which there is broad consensus is that building new homes is crucial to the UK’s future, partly because the population is increasing and partly because existing, lower-grade housing stock needs to be replaced. Because of this, high-quality property development is actively encouraged, for example, the 2016 autumn statement included a specific commitment to building new homes. Hence investors who want to enjoy the returns from property without the risk (and effort) involved in buy-to-let, might find investing in property development is the perfect solution.

Continue reading

New Build Concerns

Cowboy builders have long been fodder for the press (as well as various industry bodies and occasionally the police), but a quick look at press headlines about new build properties (and by extension, the companies which build them), could leave some home buyers with serious concerns about buying one.

What the headlines say

Some headlines point to developments which do have serious flaws in workmanship ranging from structural issues to problems with facilities such as heating or windows to more significant cosmetic flaws such as badly applied plaster. In many cases, however, the issues with new builds ultimately boil down to a mismatch between the buyer’s expectations and the reality of what they have been sold, which may have been brought about by some degree of misrepresentation. For example, a purchase contract may specify the exact dimensions of a room, but if the buyer takes a trip around a show home to help them to translate these figures into practical terms, the unwary may well find themselves caught out by the use of cut-down versions of standard household furniture, which gives the impression that the rooms are more spacious than the actually are. In fact space and the way it is used is a key issue with many new build homes.

The reality

The UK needs more new build homes. In addition to a growing population, existing low-grade housing needs to be removed and updated to meet modern requirements. This means that home builders know that there is generally an eager market waiting for any new development and, once that is sold, plenty more home buyers desperate for them to complete their next project. It’s therefore an unfortunate fact of life that some builders will look to maximise their profits by completing developments as quickly as possible and to the minimum acceptable standard. They may further resort to “tricks of the trade” to mislead buyers into thinking they are getting a higher-quality property than is actually the case.

Making a successful new build purchase

 

Understand the law

At present time, property is excluded from the Sale of Goods Act. Instead, there is an industry watchdog called the National House Building Council (NHBC). If the home owner identifies a defect within the first two years after purchase, the builder will be obliged to rectify it. After this period, structural issues will be covered for a further 8 years (making 10 years in total).

Check the credentials of your developer

In addition to speaking to the developers themselves, see what other people are saying about them. Go on to relevant internet forums and see where their name has come up in threads and what has been said about them. Be aware that even the best developers can trigger some complaints, but overall the comments should be far more positive than negative. Ask around the neighbourhood to see if you can find anyone who has already bought a property in the development which interests you. See what they have to say about their experience. If you can’t find anyone in person, try heading back online and seeing what you can learn there. Look up previous developments by that developer and either visit them in person or head back to the net to see what kind of reputation they have and how people feel about living in them now. Remember to be clear about the difference between issues which may have been caused by the developer (e.g. misrepresenting the amount of available space) and issues outside of their control (such as general changes in the local area). Check the developer’s promotional material against outside sources. For example, you could use a design tool such as SketchUp to see whether standard-size furniture will fit in a room in the same way as you saw in the show home. In other words, do thorough research on your developer before you commit to a purchase so that you can be confident that you are buying into the best that new build homes have to offer.

Continue reading

5 Ways to Invest £50,000

It’s been a long time since savings offered any sort of meaningful return, which means that those who wish to grow their cash need to look at alternatives. With that in mind, here’s a look at where you could put a £50K investment.

The Stock Market

The stock market is a big place and the companies in it perform very differently, which is understandable given that the term “the stock market” includes everything from high-tech start ups to established blue-chip companies with little in the way of growth in their share prices but great dividends. This is why there is generally at least one stock-market investment to suit anyone of any age, appetite for risk or preference for capital growth versus income yield. The stock market can provide good returns, investors just have to place their money with care and accept the fact that both individual companies and the market in general can go down as well as up.

The Property Market

The property market has long been popular with investors seeking good returns on their money with minimal risk. There are some places where £50K could buy you a feasible buy-to-let property although you might need to budget a little extra on top for sales costs, e.g. surveys, but realistically in most parts of the country and for most properties, £50K is a deposit, albeit a very substantial one in some locations. On the other hand, buy to let has become something of a contentious topic over recent years and landlords have become an easy target for government revenue collecting, with changes to stamp duty and mortgage tax relief both benefiting the exchequer at the expense of landlords. Little wonder, then, that even though BTL remains popular, some investors are looking at alternative options.

For example that same £50K could be invested in a property development thereby benefiting from property without the hassle of managing tenants and properties within the law. Obviously this is an area in which we may seem to be biased but the ROI specks for itself and with a UK investment you can literally see your investment developing..

Invest in Companies Which Qualify for Business Property Relief

This is an option which may have particular appeal to older investors, since these investments are excluded from inheritance tax calculations after two years of ownership, whereas gifts need to be given at least 7 years prior to the individual’s death to qualify for full IHT exemption. In addition to this, the holder can continue to benefit from their interest in the company up to the point of their death, whereas they must give up any and all beneficial interest in any gift they give for it to be exempt from IHT. At the same time, however, it is usually best if the investment in question actually makes sense as an investment rather than simply, or even, primarily being a means to reduce IHT liability.

Given that companies which qualify for BPR are, by definition, small and are particularly likely to be family-run firms or start-ups, finding the right vehicle for your money can be complex. You also have to remember that as firms grow, they can stop qualifying for BPR although in this case, you may seal in a profit by selling your investment (or indeed choose to hold on to it anyway).

The State Pension Top Up Scheme

If you have already reached state pension age, you have until 5th April 2017 to make a lump-sum contribution to get as much state pension as you possibly can for the rest of your life. How much this will costs depends on various factors, particularly your age and the amount of extra pension you want to receive. The clock is now ticking on this one, so you’ll need to make a quick decision as to whether this option is for you.

As with all investments it’s best to seek financial advice and always bear in mind the caveat that investments can go down as well as up!

Continue reading

New Home Manifesto – What Does It Mean?

Annual budgets serve many purposes, one of which being to show that governments are making good on election (or other commitments). Affordable housing (or the lack thereof) has long been a political hot potato in the UK and therefore it was only to be expected that the government would take some form of action to address this in the budget.

The promises in brief

There were two key points which directly relate to housing throughout the UK. The first was the promise of a £2.5bn housing infrastructure fund, which should lead to the building of 100,000 new homes in areas of high demand. The second was the promise of £1.4bn which was specifically for the provision of 40,000 affordable homes. With regards to this second point, it’s worth noting that this pledge actually goes even further than simply providing the funds. The government has relaxed the rules around bidding for the funds, meaning that companies have more options open to them than previously. In addition to this, there was a £3.15bn funding pot provided to London for the provision of affordable homes.

The budget also contained a number of promises relating to infrastructure, which could feasibly have an impact on the property market, for example increasing transport options may make it viable for people to travel to work from places they would otherwise have been forced to overlook and similarly rolling out superfast broadband may increase the options for home/remote working, which again could have a knock-on effect on the property market.

A stick for buy-to-let, a carrot for new homes

In 2015 the government delivered two sucker punches to BTL landlords. It made changes to stamp duty so that those owning more than one property paid an increased fee and it reduced the amount of mortgage tax relief which landlords could claim. The 2016 statement left BTL landlords alone, although plans were announced to clamp down on fees charged to tenants by letting agencies, but contained the announcement that the government would be supporting house building in general and the provision of affordable homes in particular.

However with new taxes and stricter lending controls coming into force in a few months the buy to let market is not looking as promising as it once did.

The outlook for 2017 and beyond

At the moment it’s rather hard to say what effect all these changes will have in practice. First of all, the autumn statement was only a few months ago and happened right before the Christmas period which has its own set of rules (some economic sectors being frantically busy, while other go into seasonal limbo). Secondly some of the changes are yet to be enacted and in some cases, it’s unclear at what point they will be implemented. For example Philip Hammond’s promise to put the brakes on agency fees is to be implemented “as soon as possible”. Thirdly, and possibly most importantly, there is very little clarity on how these pledges are going to be implemented in practice. For example, the government has relaxed rules around bidding for funds to develop affordable housing so that, in principle, bidders could develop homes for affordable rent instead of having to offer some sort of ownership option, be it shared ownership or rent to buy. These new rules, however, have yet to be tested. In other words, at this point it’s entirely unknown whether or not bidders will consider it worth their while developing property intended purely for rent or whether their applications will be accepted if they do. It’s also unclear where the priority will be in the “high demand areas”. London would be an obvious example of a place where housing is desperately needed, but it has already been designated its own pot of affordable housing funds. Presumably the answer to these questions will be revealed in time, but the government acknowledging the importance of home building in the UK is, at least, a positive sign.

https://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2016/nov/23/autumn-statement-2016-social-housing
http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/autumn-statement-2016-five-ways-it-will-affect-the-property-market-a106501.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38075649

Continue reading

What is Sustainable Housing?

Sustainability has become a huge topic over recent years and has started to impact many areas of our lives, from the food we eat to the transport we use and the homes in which we live. While the word “sustainability” may have passed into common usage, it’s worth taking a little time out to try to grasp what it means with regards to property in general and housing in particular. In general terms, the concept of sustainability refers to housing which is in harmony with its environment and ideally should have either zero environmental impact or, if at all possible, a beneficial environmental impact.

Sustainability starts with construction

One of the reasons why it’s important to replace existing “low grade” housing with a modern equivalent is that the concept of sustainability starts with the construction of the house. As time has gone by, not only have home builders gained a better idea of how to build in a sustainable manner, but they have also started to integrate more sustainable features into the fabric of the house, for example, in the UK’s climate, buildings which are created with insulating qualities are inherently more sustainable than those without.

Sustainability is closely linked to suitability for the local environment

While the basic concept of sustainability is universal and many of its general principles (such as minimising carbon emissions) also hold throughout the world, translating these principles into practice means taking into account the practical realities of any given local environment. For example, cities with high population densities, such as London and New York have been experimenting with enhancing sustainability through the use of higher-density housing, which is often closely linked with developments in technology. In simple terms, reducing the amount of housing space per head reduces the amount of materials and labour required to create it and therefore the environmental impact of its construction, plus it effectively makes for a more efficient use of resources. For example it takes the same amount of energy to heat an entire building regardless of whether it is used by 1 person, 10 people or 100 people. This approach has been yielding very positive results in the cities where it has been tried but is clearly useless in a rural environment, where dwellings can be literally miles apart from each other. In these cases, sustainability may relate more to making such dwellings “passive” in the sense that any resources they use either come from renewable sources (such as solar panels) or are replaced in some way, such as by planting trees for those cut down for wood.

Sustainable housing is dependent on sustainable infrastructure

Housing is, of course, a place for people to live and these days it’s also increasingly used as a place to work as well. Humans do not, however, spend all their lives in their homes. They need to go out to grow food or buy it, meet people, go to work, use services and do all kinds of other things. This means that developing sustainable housing needs the support of sustainable infrastructure. Again, what this means in practice depends on the local environment. In the city, where distances are relatively short, it may mean encouraging “zero-carbon” modes of transport such as cycling, by making them safe in every sense of the phrase and also providing effective public-transport for those for whom activities such as cycling are impractical (e.g. those with disabilities). In the countryside, however, the population spread can make it extremely challenging to develop a meaningful public transport network, so again sustainability returns to the concept of using renewable resources and/or replacing any resources used. In terms of transport this could mean making the switch to electric cars powered by solar energy as opposed to petrol ones.

Continue reading

Property investment is not about getting rich quickly

Anyone who’s tuned into daytime TV or seen an advert before a YouTube video has probably seen a self-styled property guru offering to provide you with details of the secret but simple system which allowed them to accumulate vast wealth in a short time. Hopefully most people are intelligent enough to realise that property investment is anything but a get-rich-quick scheme. Here are three reasons why this is absolutely not the case.

1 – Successful property investing takes both strategy and the real market knowledge to implement it.

Investors need to have a clear strategy for building and maintaining their property portfolio. This may be to target a particular demographic (such as students or young professionals), a particular area (such as London and its surroundings) or a particular type of property (such as desirable new build). They then need to research they chosen approach to get the information they need to make it work in practice and they need to continue their research to ensure that they keep abreast with (if not ahead of) market trends and thereby keep their portfolio in good shape.

2 – Successful property investing takes motivation and organisation

Doing proper research takes time and it is not just a one-off activity. As the old joke goes, change is the only constant in the world and successful investors in any area need to make the time to keep on top of all new developments. This means that property investors need to be able to organise their schedule so that it includes time for this research and since there are only 24 hours in each day, this can mean either sacrificing or delegating other activities. This level of commitment takes both motivation and organisation.

3 – Successful property investing generally takes a support team

Successful property investors understand the importance of human relationships and of having a good support team. From initiating a purchase transaction with the seller, be it through an estate agent or directly with a property developer, to dealing with financing organisations and letting agencies (or tenants directly), to staying on top of legal requirements and managing the financial side of property investment, property investors understand the importance of getting support from the best people and of maintaining good relationships with them. There are two people in particular that most serious property investors will want to have on their team.

The first is a good lawyer. There can be a lot of legal requirements to be met when dealing with any form of property investment. Using a good lettings agency can mitigate many of these, but it can still be very much in a landlord’s best interests to have at least some level of familiarity with the relevant laws and a source of legal advice if needed. Good lawyers can also prove invaluable when it comes to understanding the key points of leases. While leases for new-build property are generally relatively straightforward, leases for existing property, particularly older property can be much more complicated and it is very much to the buyer’s benefit to resolve any issues prior to the exchange of contracts.

The second is a good accountant. Property investment and taxation go hand in hand. Good accountants will help with statutory compliance matters such as the preparation of rental accounts, the submission of personal tax returns and the provision of representation in the event that HMRC makes an investor the subject of an enquiry. They can also offer consultancy services, such as offering guidance as to when a corporate ownership structure might be more efficient than personal ownership and also what options might be available for reducing the cost of owning and/or selling property, such as making the best use of various forms of tax relief and where it is possible to off-set costs as tax deductions.

Continue reading

© 2017 Bastien Jack. All Rights Reserved